I bought Maestro (1989) by Peter Goldsworthy because I liked the colour of the spine. Ok, that's not quite true - it was the minty-turquoisey colour which made me take it off the shelf; when I discovered that it was Australian, and sounded interesting, I decided it was worth £2 of my money. I'm glad I did - not just because I get to join in with Kim et al, but because it was rather good.
Although it's Australian - written by an Australian, set in 1967 Darwin, Australia (the location of choice for characters leaving Neighbours, incidentally, if they're not going to London) - much of the impetus is tied to Europe. Eduard Keller is a Viennese refugee who teaches piano to fifteen year old Paul Crabbe (already an experienced pianist) whose family have recently moved from South Australia to the dry heat of Darwin. Except Keller doesn't teach piano in any traditional sense - he forbids Paul to use the piano for the first few weeks, instead instructing him in the importance of each individual finger...
Keller waggled a forefinger in front of my nose. It was our second lesson? Our third?I have an ambivalent relationship with novels about music. I enjoyed The Well-Tempered Clavier by William Coles (although I was glad that Maestro didn't follow it down the Notes on a Scandal-esque path, not least because of the sixty year gap between Keller and Paul, but also because it's not a very original course to take.) I loved The Piano Shop on the Left Bank by Thad Carhart, which is non-fiction. But novels leave me cold when they rely upon the ethos that music is the highest of all forms. I played the piano from the age of seven onwards, and although I later became friends with my piano teacher (the lady who first told me of Miss Hargreaves) and eventually grew to like playing the piano, for many years I passionately hated it. The best feeling in the world (and my brother agrees with me) was when you rang the doorbell for a piano lesson... and the teacher didn't answer! The worst feeling was when you thought the piano teacher wasn't going to answer, and then, after a long gap... she did. So, anyway, this has given me an odd relationship with stories about learning instruments, and my dislike of elitism comes into play with musical maestros.
"This finger is selfish. Greedy. A... a delinquent. He will steal from his four friends, cheat, lie."
He sheathed the forefinger in his closed fist as if it were the fleshy blade of a Swiss army knife and released the middle finger.
"Mr. goody-goody," he said, banging the finger down on middle C repeatedly. "Teacher's pet. Does what he is told. Our best student."
Last came the ring finger.
"Likes to follow his best friend," he told me. "Likes to... lean on him sometimes."
He lifted his elbows upwards and outwards.
"Those are the pupils. This is the teacher. The elbow..."
I'm sure it's possible to be a musical expert without being arrogant and rude, of course, but Keller is not one of these. He is one of the most rude, supercilious characters I've ever encountered - but he is battling his own demons, and the love and respect Paul feels towards Keller are contagious. Even so, I found it arrogant rather than inspiring when he said things like this:
"Perhaps you could play one of the exam pieces, Paul," my father suggested. "A private concert for the three of us."
"The Brahms?"
"The Beethoven," Keller injected, "might be preferable."
I played Beethoven that night as well as I had ever played, and turned afterwards, smiling, ready for praise.
"Beautiful," my mother breathed. "Don't you agree, Herr Keller?"
"An excellent forgery," he said.
"I'm sorry?"
"Technically perfect," he said.
He drained his wineglass before continuing. It was to be his longest monologue of the evening:
"At such moments I always remember a forged painting I once saw. Each violent brushstroke was reproduced was painstaking, non-violent care. The forgery must have taken many many times longer than the original to complete. It was technically better than the original."
He rose from his chair and walked a little unsteadily towards the door: "And yet something was missing. Not much - but something."
At the door he paused, and turned: "And that small something may as well have been everything."
But Keller is miserable for other reasons... it gradually becomes clear that he was more involved in the Second World War than he originally admits. I shan't give the game away, although it isn't a big twist and doesn't come as much of a surprise to the reader. If you're rolling your eyes at yet another long-shadow-of-war novel, then don't. It's only one element in the interesting construction of the interaction between Keller and Paul - which is the really interesting central focus of Maestro. Their relationship isn't romantic or fatherly or even particularly close. Keller resists any sort of emotional connection, and Paul is far too full of youthful insensitivity to do anything but blunder into conversations in which he is too immature to participate, even if Keller were willing. But what Goldsworthy builds between Keller and the Crabbes is still somehow beautiful. The connection between people who never open up to one another; the legacies left behind a relationship which could not even be called a friendship. Goldsworthy has done this beautifully.
One of the things I'm realising, doing A Century of Books and stepping further outside the interwar period, where I am happiest, is the way a decade colours each novel, even without the author intentionally following the zeitgeist. A bit like people who claim not to follow fashion, until they look back at old photographs and see how much they were unwittingly influenced by the style of the day. So Maestro is filtered through the lens of the 1980s, whether Goldsworthy likes it or not. I certainly wouldn't read that people 'made slow, muffled, reckless love' in the pages of an Elizabeth von Arnim novel, for instance. Indeed, the whole coming-of-age storyline (although much less irritating in Maestro than it is in some book) is very 1980s, and rather incidental to the main thrust of the novel - but perhaps it's main purpose is to demonstrate that Keller does not completely occupy Paul's thoughts. He is not obsessed by Keller, but their relationship will alter a great deal in his life.
Maestro is a difficult little book to write about - it is wise, original, and rather beautiful. I would love it a great deal more if someone could translate it into the sensitivities of the 1940s, say, but of course that cannot be done. It reminded me a bit of Hallucinating Foucault by Patricia Duncker and Virginia by Jens Christian Grondahl, but I'm hard-pressed to say quite why - the influence of genius, for the former? The lifelong effects of a brief connection, for the latter? Perhaps, truth be told, Maestro isn't quite like anything else I've read before, but does bring together themes and traits I've seen in many other authors, writing both before and after Goldsworthy.
As for whether it's a representative Australian novel - well, of course there's no such thing. Goldsworthy conveyed the heat of Darwin very well, but aside from that... I'll have to see which other novels are picked up across the blogs during what's left of Australian Literature Month. Thanks, Kim, for indirectly encouraging to find, buy, and enjoy a novel I would otherwise have left in the shop. And thanks for helping fill 1989 in A Century of Books!
